Under the hood
Six specialized agents, at least two model families, and a human with the final say. Here's what that changes in practice, from ticket to Pull Request.
Every feature described here is in production — not a roadmap promise.
Core of the system
A router sends each ticket to the right agents, then chains planning, code and review. The right model for each task, never the premium model for everything.
Trust
Code isn't taken at face value. Several model families vote, a static analysis runs in parallel, and any disagreement reaches a human rather than being buried.
Control
Every model call is traced and priced. You set a cap per project or organization; at the cap, the pipeline stops dead, with no silent overrun.
Delivery
The pipeline never touches your main branch. It creates a branch, commits, opens a Pull Request, and leaves the merge to you. GitHub, Bitbucket and GitLab, your choice.
Day to day
Two modes, one reality. The PM creates and validates from a Kanban; the Dev dives into the graph, diffs and logs. Final validation needs both green lights.
Accessible
Bilingual from birth, not as an afterthought. Native fr-CA and en interface, compliant contrast and careful keyboard navigation on every screen.
The difference
Why orchestrate instead of handing everything to one big model.
| Aspect | Single premium model | develops pipeline |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per ticket | About $10, premium model for every step. | About $3 to $5, the right model for each task. |
| Code verification | The author grades its own work. | Tests by another model, multi-vote and SAST. |
| Security | Blind trust in a single output. | Cross votes; disagreement = human escalation. |
| Spend control | Bill discovered after the fact. | Hard caps, clean stop, real-time tracking. |
| Delivery | Raw output you integrate yourself. | Branch, commit and PR ready, before/after shots. |
Ready to orchestrate
Currently deployed internally on our own projects. Reach out for early access and an end-to-end demonstration.